Challenges in Explaining Pretrained Clinical Text Classifiers
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Challenges in Explaining Pretrained Clinical Text Classifiers
Abstract:Explaining the predictions of neural models in clinical NLP remains a significant challenge, especially for complex tasks involving long, unstructured medical texts. While post-hoc methods like LIME and SHAP are widely used, they often fall short when applied to clinical narratives. In this paper, we identify core limitations of token-level and perturbation-based explanation techniques through targeted demonstra- tions on a hospital length-of-stay prediction task. Our findings reveal issues such as overemphasis on non-informative tokens, instability in at- tributions, and high-confidence predictions for incoherent input variants. These results underscore the need for explanation strategies that are clin- ically meaningful, semantically grounded, and robust to linguistic noise.
| Comments: | 9 pages, 7 figures. Accepted at the First Workshop on Responsible Healthcare using Machine Learning (RHCML 2025), co-located with ECML PKDD 2025 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.28060 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.28060v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28060
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Journal reference: | Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. ECML PKDD 2025. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 2842, pp. 314-322. Springer, Cham (2026) |
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-19105-2_22
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
GRPO, Dr. GRPO, and DAPO Are Three Operations on One Number: The Group-Standard-Deviation Identity
Jul 2
-
Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds
Jul 2
-
EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
Jul 2
-
Mapping the Evaluation Frontier: An Empirical Survey of the Bias-Reliability Tradeoff Across Eleven Evaluator-Agent Conditions
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.