arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

The Symbol of the Surrogate: Measuring Numerical Provenance in Neural PDE Solvers

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.09255 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026]

Title:The Symbol of the Surrogate: Measuring Numerical Provenance in Neural PDE Solvers

Authors:Ridham Patel
View a PDF of the paper titled The Symbol of the Surrogate: Measuring Numerical Provenance in Neural PDE Solvers, by Ridham Patel
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Neural PDE surrogates are trained on numerical solver outputs that contain both physical evolution and solver-specific discretization errors. Because surrogates are also evaluated against held-out trajectories from the same solver, standard benchmarks cannot distinguish fidelity to the exact evolution from imitation of the numerical scheme. We introduce an empirical Fourier-symbol diagnostic that probes a trained surrogate's linearized one-step operator with individual Fourier modes and compares it with both exact-evolution and training-scheme references. To address architectural spectral bias, we train identical networks on schemes with orthogonal dissipative and dispersive signatures and compare their learned operators. In linear advection, the learned surrogates reproduce the training schemes' amplitude and phase errors, with the twin-scheme difference reaching more than 99.8\% of the analytically predicted full-imitation ceiling. The same behavior occurs for a non-local Fourier neural operator and at the operator level for nonlinear Burgers dynamics. These results show that agreement with solver-generated test data does not by itself establish fidelity to the exact evolution. Fourier-symbol measurements provide a direct diagnostic of numerical provenance.
Comments: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 AI for Science Workshop
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Analysis of PDEs (math.AP); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.09255 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.09255v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09255
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ridham Patel [view email]
[v1] Wed, 7 Oct 2026 00:42:11 UTC (266 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning