Training a Qwen 3.5 4B/9B agent for multi-tool use: SFT first or go directly to RL?
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
To train Qwen 3.5 4B or 9B for a custom multi-tool agent workflow and would appreciate guidance from people who have done this successfully.
A few questions:
SFT → RL or RL-only?
- Is it still recommended to first do supervised fine-tuning (tool-calling traces, reasoning trajectories, etc.) and then apply RL?
- Or are people seeing good results with RL-based training directly for tool-use tasks?
Reward design
- How do you design reward functions for tool-use agents?
Parallel tool execution
- One complication in my workflow:
- Tool A returns N items
- The agent must call Tool B N times, potentially in parallel
- Then aggregate the results
How would you represent and train this behavior?
For those who have trained production-quality tool-use models, what training recipe worked best?
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
What's in your RAG?
Jul 2
-
Palantir CEO rages against closed models
Jul 2
-
A cheap trick for reliable structured output: feed the validation error back into the retry
Jul 2
-
SenseNova-U1-8b-MoT-Infographic-V2 (released yesterday) - An open source SOTA beast for infographic design and image editing.
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.