Training a Qwen 3.5 4B/9B agent for multi-tool use: SFT first or go directly to RL?
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
To train Qwen 3.5 4B or 9B for a custom multi-tool agent workflow and would appreciate guidance from people who have done this successfully.
A few questions:
SFT → RL or RL-only?
- Is it still recommended to first do supervised fine-tuning (tool-calling traces, reasoning trajectories, etc.) and then apply RL?
- Or are people seeing good results with RL-based training directly for tool-use tasks?
Reward design
- How do you design reward functions for tool-use agents?
Parallel tool execution
- One complication in my workflow:
- Tool A returns N items
- The agent must call Tool B N times, potentially in parallel
- Then aggregate the results
How would you represent and train this behavior?
For those who have trained production-quality tool-use models, what training recipe worked best?
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Are there any interesting architectural innovations that we seem to be on the verge of for LLM models or AI models that might be a big deal? (Excluding maybe N-gram, since everyone is already well aware of that one)
Aug 30
-
Demo of local document extraction (52 pages) using Arctic Embed and Bonsai 8B on an Iphone 16 (KernelAI app)
Aug 30
-
Will apple still release devices with mobile HbM in 2027 ?
Aug 30
-
NVIDIA® DGX Station™ Delivering Data-Center-Class Performance from the Desktop
Aug 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.