arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Fusion techniques of time frequency-based images to predict the outcome of rTMS depression therapy

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.00380 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]

Title:Fusion techniques of time frequency-based images to predict the outcome of rTMS depression therapy

View a PDF of the paper titled Fusion techniques of time frequency-based images to predict the outcome of rTMS depression therapy, by Wael Korani and Md Fahimul Kabir Chowdhury and Mohammed Aledhari and Reza Rostami and Reza Kazemi
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Depression is a mental condition that can lead to suicide and self-harm. Predicting the outcome of depression treatment is one of the most difficult tasks for clinicians. Among various treatment options, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a widely used non-invasive method. Predicting rTMS response using Electroencephalogram (EEG) data is difficult because of high inter-subject variability and limited features from single-domain analysis. We introduce two fusion techniques, montage and blending, to overcome these limitations and extract richer features from EEG-derived Time-Frequency (TF) images. We then propose a lightweight custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on fused TF representations. \textcolor{black}{We use a primary dataset of 15 patients and a secondary dataset of 46 patients. We run two sets of experiments. The first set uses segment-level 10-fold cross-validation. In this setup segments from the same patient can appear in both training and testing. The Montage CWT\_ST fusion reaches 99.90\% accuracy on the primary dataset and 91.90\% on the secondary dataset. The second set uses strict subject-disjoint cross-validation. All segments of a patient stay in one fold and no patient appears in both training and testing. Performance collapses. We test four time-frequency methods, six fusion mechanisms, and fourteen model architectures. With one exception, every configuration on both cohorts falls between AUC 0.31 and 0.54 and every 95\% confidence interval contains 0.5. A patient-level permutation test on the best standalone method returns $p = 0.703$. The best subject-level result is Montage CWT\_ST on the primary cohort, which reaches AUC $0.874 \pm 0.183$ and 82.7\% accuracy.
Comments: Published in the Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.00380 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.00380v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00380
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2026.111375
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Md Fahimul Kabir Chowdhury [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:50:26 UTC (969 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Fusion techniques of time frequency-based images to predict the outcome of rTMS depression therapy, by Wael Korani and Md Fahimul Kabir Chowdhury and Mohammed Aledhari and Reza Rostami and Reza Kazemi
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning