Multimodal Evaluator Preference Collapse: Cross-Modal Coupling in Self-Evolving Agents
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Multimodal Evaluator Preference Collapse: Cross-Modal Coupling in Self-Evolving Agents
Abstract:When AI agents use language models to evaluate their own outputs in a feedback loop, systematic biases emerge. We show that Evaluator Preference Collapse (EPC) is dramatically amplified in multimodal settings. Using GPT-4o to evaluate DeepSeek-chat across text and visual tasks, we find that a single strategy (step_by_step) absorbs 48.4% of all weight -- 3.2x the collapse observed in text-only self-evaluation -- while three visual-domain strategies receive only 9.1% combined weight. We then demonstrate a novel phenomenon we term cross-modal coupling: evaluator preferences acquired on one modality transfer to and corrupt strategy selection on another. Through a four-phase isolation training paradigm, we measure coupling coefficients and document strategy inversion -- the optimal strategy for a modality reverses after cross-modal exposure. A Phase 3 statistical validation across five evaluator configurations (N=80 total independent repetitions, ~35,000 API calls) with both text-proxy and real-image visual tasks finds: cross-model evaluation produces strong coupling (JSD~0.19-0.34), real-image inputs yield the most directionally consistent signal (mean gamma_{T->V}=1.145, gamma_{V->T}=0.937, 70% T->V, Cohen's d=0.56), and self-evaluation provides near-complete immunity -- 97% of runs (N=30) yield zero coupling (JSD=0.003, d=0.07). Three methodological ablations and multi-executor validation confirm the effect is not a structural artifact. We introduce the coupling matrix indexed by evaluator identity, release the MM-EPC framework, and identify cross-model evaluator architecture as the primary risk factor for preference drift. Code and data: this https URL.
| Comments: | 17 pages, 0 figures |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; I.2.10 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.16682 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.16682v3 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.16682
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Zewen Liu [view email][v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:18:20 UTC (20 KB)
[v2] Thu, 18 Jun 2026 13:02:25 UTC (20 KB)
[v3] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:02:22 UTC (20 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
GRPO, Dr. GRPO, and DAPO Are Three Operations on One Number: The Group-Standard-Deviation Identity
Jul 2
-
Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds
Jul 2
-
EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
Jul 2
-
Mapping the Evaluation Frontier: An Empirical Survey of the Bias-Reliability Tradeoff Across Eleven Evaluator-Agent Conditions
Jul 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.