Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attribution
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Explaining GAND: A Resource on Gender-Ambiguous Natural Data & Contrastive Attribution
Abstract:Machine translation (MT) systems continue to produce gender-biased translations. In a time where self-expression is paramount, mistranslations based on default behaviour and stereotyping can lead to harm for users of these systems. To better understand how these systems translate gender in the absence of clear gender cues, we need benchmarking resources that reflect gender-ambiguous scenarios in a natural way. To this end, we present GAND, a gender-ambiguous natural data benchmarking resource for MT consisting of English source sentences, specifically designed to analyse the influence of contextual cues on gender in translation. We leverage GAND to conduct an interpretability analysis: we translate a subset of GAND into two grammatical gender languages and extend these with manually crafted contrastive translations. A following feature attribution analysis reveals source words in context that inform the gender translation of an ambiguous referent entity in the target translation.
| Comments: | Accepted at EAMT2026: Technical Track |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.22546 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.22546v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22546
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Janiça Hackenbuchner [view email][v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 11:58:20 UTC (5,089 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.