How come artificialanalysis.ai ranks Gemma4 above Qwen3.6 27b in SciCode
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
| Just came across this coding benchmark: SciCode Artificialanalysis.ai reports a ranking which contradicts the feeling we've towards those models in real life coding. Is Gemma 4 really that good, or a benchmarking issue? EDIT: The contribution of this benchmark to the Intelligence index of artificialanalysis.ai: Full Intelligence Index v4.1 weights: GDPval-AA v2: 20% Terminal-Bench 2.1: 16% τ³-Bench Banking: 14% Humanity's Last Exam: 12% AA-Omniscience Accuracy: 8% SciCode: 8% GPQA: 6% AA-LCR: 6% CritPt: 6% AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination: 4% Source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/artificial-analysis-intelligence-index-v4-1 [link] [comments] |
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next locally on simple mobile phone at 3.5 tok/s
Aug 30
-
Unpopular opinion Qwen 3.8 is hard to understand
Aug 30
-
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next turns 4xR9700 into a local AI powerhouse! 120 t/s TG and 12k t/s PP single request with optimized vLLM
Aug 30
-
Oh so that's where my PCIe lanes went...
Aug 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.