arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Behavioral Latency as Weak Event-Time Supervision for EEG Reaction-Time Decoding

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2608.29428 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2026]

Title:Behavioral Latency as Weak Event-Time Supervision for EEG Reaction-Time Decoding

View a PDF of the paper titled Behavioral Latency as Weak Event-Time Supervision for EEG Reaction-Time Decoding, by Anuar Aimoldin and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Single-trial EEG analyses are often organized around events and latencies, yet EEG-based reaction-time (RT) prediction is posed as scalar regression on a fixed stimulus-locked window. RT is treated as a window-level label rather than timing evidence about response-relevant dynamics. Here we reformulate trial-wise RT decoding as event-time posterior modeling. Instead of predicting RT directly, the model estimates a posterior over response-relevant event times, $p(t_{\mathrm{event}}\mid X)$, and uses its mean as the RT estimate. This treats behavioral latency as a weak observation of latent response-relevant timing. We evaluate this formulation on the Healthy Brain Network contrast change detection EEG task under a subject-disjoint, release-separated protocol. Across five seeds, distributional event-time supervision consistently improves held-out RT prediction relative to scalar regression and temporal-readout controls. Controlled objective comparisons isolate supervision of the event-time distribution, rather than expectation-based readout alone, as the source of this gain. Architecture controls show that the effect persists across four temporal backbones and is not explained by model scale. Beyond point prediction, posterior geometry characterizes concentration, target alignment, and interval behavior, while observation-noise calibration separates latent concentration from predictive uncertainty over RT. Shifted-crop inference probes shortcut use versus temporal localization. Matched shift-jitter improves robustness, increases mean sensitivity, and moves predictions more often in the expected crop-relative direction. Sensitivity remains below ideal crop-relative localization, leaving a clear equivariance gap. Together, these results establish event-time posterior modeling as a probabilistic and interpretable formulation for linking single-trial EEG dynamics to behavioral timing.
Comments: 33 pages, including appendices; 7 figures and 12 tables. Accepted for publication in Neural Computation
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.29428 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2608.29428v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29428
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ayana Mussabayeva [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:18:03 UTC (3,048 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Behavioral Latency as Weak Event-Time Supervision for EEG Reaction-Time Decoding, by Anuar Aimoldin and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning