arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Removing Information Content Does Not Certify Tamper Resistance in Open-Weight Models

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.09004 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Oct 2026]

Title:Removing Information Content Does Not Certify Tamper Resistance in Open-Weight Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Removing Information Content Does Not Certify Tamper Resistance in Open-Weight Models, by Domenic Rosati and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Does removing harmful information make open-weight models resistant to fine-tuning attacks? We show that mutual information at release alone cannot universally certify slow recovery. Function-preserving reparameterizations leave information unchanged while altering gradient-descent geometry, so an invariant certificate is bounded by the fastest reachable parameterization. We apply this principle to weight--data mutual information under training-data filtering and label--representation mutual information under capability removal. Training order can change recovery time at fixed weight--data information, while exact representation-level independence can preserve the entire parameter Jacobian. An explicit construction has both information quantities equal to zero and recovers in one gradient step. Controlled experiments illustrate order-dependent recovery and parameterization-dependent attack speed. These results identify the missing requirement for certification: constraints on attack dynamics beyond mutual information at release.
Comments: Under submission AISTATS 2026
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.09004 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.09004v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09004
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Domenic Rosati [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 18:59:57 UTC (118 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Removing Information Content Does Not Certify Tamper Resistance in Open-Weight Models, by Domenic Rosati and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning