arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Not Just an Evaluation: A Case Study of Discourse Particle Sensitivity in Language Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2610.13794 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Oct 2026]

Title:Not Just an Evaluation: A Case Study of Discourse Particle Sensitivity in Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Not Just an Evaluation: A Case Study of Discourse Particle Sensitivity in Language Models, by William Sheffield and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Discourse particles subtly shape the flow of discourse by reflecting conversational context and interlocutor attitudes, often leaving the truth-conditional meaning untouched. They are also often polyfunctional, with distinct senses which partially overlap with other particles; for example, the exclusive use of English "just" and "only" ("John only/just drinks water"). Despite the frequency of these words in natural language, they have gone largely unstudied due to the subtle nature of their effects. We investigate LLM sensitivity to "just" and "only" in natural conversations using behavioral and mechanistic analyses. First, we find that LLMs and humans similarly prefer the presence of these particles in context, and both are more sensitive to "just" compared to "only". Second, when sampling from LLMs with and without these particles, we find LLMs consistently rate generations as more likely, given their source context, demonstrating their particle sensitivity. In both experiments, instruction tuning increases sensitivity. Finally, we localize particle-sensitive units within LLMs and find the overlap between "just" and "only" is asymmetric: "only" units transfer selectively to exclusive "just", while all "just" units transfer to "only" equally well regardless of sense, suggesting LLM lexical-level particle representations are partially organized by sense. We release our code, sense-labeled dialogue stimuli, and human preference annotations at this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.13794 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2610.13794v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13794
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiahui Chen [view email]
[v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 16:07:24 UTC (569 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Not Just an Evaluation: A Case Study of Discourse Particle Sensitivity in Language Models, by William Sheffield and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language