Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLM
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLM
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized content creation across digital platforms, offering unprecedented capabilities in natural language generation and understanding. Meanwhile, they pose risks by inadvertently producing toxic, offensive, or biased content. This dual role of LLMs, both as powerful tools for text generation and as potential sources of harmful language, presents a pressing sociotechnical challenge. In this survey, we systematically review recent studies encompassing unintentional toxicity, adversarial jailbreak attacks, and comprehensive mitigation strategies. We explore LLMs' dual role as both generators of harm and enablers of safety through detection, classification, content moderation, and prevention. We propose a unified taxonomy of LLM-related harms and defenses, analyze emerging multimodal and LLM-assisted jailbreak strategies, and assess mitigation efforts, including reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), prompt engineering, and safety alignment. Our review highlights the evolving landscape of LLM safety and identifies limitations in current evaluation methodologies. Ultimately, our review outlines future research directions to guide the development of robust and ethically aligned language technologies.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2508.05775 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2508.05775v3 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05775
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Chi Zhang [view email][v1] Thu, 7 Aug 2025 18:42:16 UTC (3,880 KB)
[v2] Wed, 13 Aug 2025 07:40:27 UTC (3,879 KB)
[v3] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 20:50:40 UTC (3,893 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.