arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Right Direction, Wrong Step: Geometric Analysis of Finite-Step Failure in Looped Transformers

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.16665 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026]

Title:Right Direction, Wrong Step: Geometric Analysis of Finite-Step Failure in Looped Transformers

View a PDF of the paper titled Right Direction, Wrong Step: Geometric Analysis of Finite-Step Failure in Looped Transformers, by Zhihao Guo and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Looped Transformers offer a parameter-efficient route to test-time scaling by reusing shared layers for iterative latent reasoning. However, additional iterations can reduce support for a reference answer, leaving unclear whether an update's direction is locally unhelpful or its full displacement moves too far. We study this distinction by analysing reference utility, which measures this support, along the model's own update direction, varying the fraction of the proposed displacement supplied to the readout. This reveals finite-step failures in which a locally improving direction produces a harmful full update. A pathwise curvature decomposition characterises how initial progress is lost, while a local quadratic model predicts full-step gains and useful step scales. Bounds based on accumulated curvature variation characterise the approximation error of these predictions. Experiments across two model families reveal this separation on mathematical and commonsense tasks. A fixed quarter step produces positive gains in reference utility for 72.2--83.2% of selected failures across four settings. These findings identify a mismatch between update direction and step scale as a mechanism of lost progress, explaining how some harmful updates retain useful computation.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.16665 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.16665v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16665
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zonghan Wu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 05:42:02 UTC (518 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Right Direction, Wrong Step: Geometric Analysis of Finite-Step Failure in Looped Transformers, by Zhihao Guo and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning