EditPPT: Faithful Long-Deck Slide Editing via Structured Tool-Using Multi-Agent with Dual-Modal Validators
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:EditPPT: Faithful Long-Deck Slide Editing via Structured Tool-Using Multi-Agent with Dual-Modal Validators
Abstract:Automating slide editing requires simultaneously satisfying modification accuracy, preservation fidelity, and robustness to deck length. Existing LLM-based systems often fail on real-world presentation files because they rely on idealized intermediate representations or open-ended code generation, which are prone to cascading errors in long decks. We introduce EditPPT, a multi-agent framework that reformulates slide editing as a constrained tool-selection problem. By executing localized shape-level operations through the native PowerPoint COM interface, EditPPT narrows the LLM action space while preserving the application-resolved structure of user-authored decks. By separating validation across modalities, our dual-modal validation provides more robust assessment of both instruction fidelity and visual quality. We also present DeckEdit-Bench, a benchmark with 28 human-authored decks, 582 slides, and 183 editing prompts across short, medium, and long deck tiers. Experiments show that EditPPT achieves a 99.5% execution rate, 88.7% slide-targeting F1, 82.5% instruction following, and 91.5% object preservation overall, while maintaining strong performance on long decks. Our code and benchmark are available at this https URL
| Comments: | 30 pages, 7 figures, 17 tables, EMNLP 2026 submitted, under review |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.20381 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.20381v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20381
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.