arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

When Reranking Hurts: Uncertainty-Based Gating for Few-Shot Reranking

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.31087 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Jun 2026]

Title:When Reranking Hurts: Uncertainty-Based Gating for Few-Shot Reranking

View a PDF of the paper titled When Reranking Hurts: Uncertainty-Based Gating for Few-Shot Reranking, by Orian Dabod and Amir Cohen and Gabriel Stanovsky
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Few-shot selection typically assumes that reranking retrieved examples always improves performance. We challenge this view by identifying that the expensive reranking step can in fact degrade performance. Instead, we propose \emph{Training-Free Gated Reranking}, which decides whether to rerank the few-shot examples based on the model's uncertainty. Extensive experiments across 8 LLMs, covering 7 NLU datasets and 9 MT domain-language combinations, demonstrate that our approach reduces computational costs by 15\%-80\% while improving average performance by up to 2\%. These findings indicate that higher computational cost does not guarantee better performance, and that reranking is most beneficial when targeted at high-uncertainty instances.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.31087 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.31087v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.31087
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Orian Dabod [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Jun 2026 03:24:53 UTC (118 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled When Reranking Hurts: Uncertainty-Based Gating for Few-Shot Reranking, by Orian Dabod and Amir Cohen and Gabriel Stanovsky
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language