arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Safety Alignment Illusion: The Cross-Lingual Safety Gap in LLMs

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2608.18131 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Jul 2026]

Title:Safety Alignment Illusion: The Cross-Lingual Safety Gap in LLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled Safety Alignment Illusion: The Cross-Lingual Safety Gap in LLMs, by Namya Bhatnagar
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Current safety alignment training for Large Language Models (LLMs) are heavily English-centric. When such safety filters fail for non-English languages, the consequences are immediate and user-facing: voice assistants and spoken dialogue systems may produce stereotype-reinforcing outputs, bypassing the standard English-focused safety alignments and propagating harmful bias to non-English speaking communities. For spoken language technologies deployed across India's linguistically diverse population, this represents a critical failure mode. To address this cross-lingual gap, we introduce INCLUDE (Indian Cultural Lens for Understanding and Detecting Embedded Biases), a multilingual evaluation benchmark designed to quantify Indian-centric socio-cultural biases. INCLUDE consists of 2,604 prompts spanning six prompt languages: English, Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, Tamil, and Hinglish (Hindi-English code-mix). We evaluate ten open- and closed-source LLMs against this benchmark, analyzing 14,988 bias scores. Our statistical results reveal two key findings. First, Bengali yielded the highest average bias score in open-source models. Second, English demonstrated a notable reversal, producing the lowest bias in open-source models but the highest bias in closed-source models.
Comments: 7 pages, 8 figures, submitted to IEEE SLT (Spoken Language Technology) 2026
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
ACM classes: I.2.7; K.4.2
Cite as: arXiv:2608.18131 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2608.18131v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18131
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Namya Bhatnagar [view email]
[v1] Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:23:25 UTC (5,379 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language