arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Budgeted Multi-Source Counterfactual Annotation for Off-Policy Evaluation

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.10974 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026]

Title:Budgeted Multi-Source Counterfactual Annotation for Off-Policy Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled Budgeted Multi-Source Counterfactual Annotation for Off-Policy Evaluation, by Biao Xiang and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Off-policy evaluation (OPE) estimates the value of a target policy from logged data, but limited behavior-policy coverage can force high-variance reweighting or reward-model extrapolation. Counterfactual annotations can add evidence about unobserved actions, yet practical sources, including domain experts and large language models (LLMs), may be costly, biased, or noisy. We study budgeted acquisition of such annotations for contextual-bandit OPE. Given source-specific costs and error profiles, we formulate an integer allocation problem over context-action pairs and annotation sources to minimize the component of estimator variance that depends on the annotation plan. We characterize when annotations are valuable through a first-annotation threshold and local annotation-value regimes. For the coupled multi-source problem, we develop a majorization-minimization algorithm with dynamic-programming subroutines that monotonically improves the objective. Experiments in synthetic clinical and LLM-annotated education bandits show that our allocation method reduces fixed-profile mean squared error (MSE) by 20.58% and 10.77%, respectively, relative to no annotation.
Comments: Accepted to NeurIPS 2026. Code available at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.10974 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.10974v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10974
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Biao Xiang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 7 Oct 2026 22:55:15 UTC (662 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning