Mapping Similarity Spaces across Embedding Models with Synthetic Query Probing
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Mapping Similarity Spaces across Embedding Models with Synthetic Query Probing
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems rely on similarity scores to retrieve relevant content, yet scores are not directly comparable across embedding models due to differing geometric properties, complicating model migration and limiting threshold reuse. We study how similarity scores can be related by learning mappings between score distributions rather than embeddings. We introduce Synthetic Query Probing, generating queries from documents to create controlled query-chunk pairs, enabling large-scale, reference-free analysis of cross-model similarity behavior. We evaluate the approach on multiple embedding configurations and learn score conversion functions using linear, isotonic, and quantile mappings. Experiments on SciFact and a proprietary corpus show that while models largely agree on rankings, their absolute scores exhibit systematic distortions. Learned mappings partially align these spaces and improve threshold portability, with isotonic regression performing best. Our results highlight the need for cross-model calibration and position Synthetic Query Probing as a scalable framework for analyzing embedding comparability.
| Comments: | Accepted for 29th International Conference on Discovery Science, October 5-9, 2026, Mainz, Germany |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.05857 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.05857v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05857
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Peter van der Putten [view email][v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:38:13 UTC (6,268 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.