$\tau$-Multilingual: Benchmarking Voice Agents Across Languages
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.35820 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Sep 2026]
Title:$τ$-Multilingual: Benchmarking Voice Agents Across Languages
Authors:Soham Ray, Edgard dos Santos Paiva, Ruben Valenzuela, Karthik Narasimhan, Keshav Dhandhania, Victor Barres
View a PDF of the paper titled $\tau$-Multilingual: Benchmarking Voice Agents Across Languages, by Soham Ray and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:English-only benchmarks expose only a narrow slice of voice-agent behavior. We introduce $\tau$-Multilingual, extending $\tau$-Voice to Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, Hindi, Korean, and Mandarin with native-speaker review and evaluation of generated language and spoken output. Across 4,500 full-duplex calls and five voice configurations, Spanish, Portuguese, and Hindi remain within 3.2 task-completion points of English, but Korean and Mandarin fall by 14.7 and 8.4 points. The failure modes also vary: Korean systems miss more responses, Mandarin systems interrupt more often, and both struggle with tools and entities. Grok leads task completion but scores lowest on generation quality, motivating separate task, interaction, and generation reporting. We release language packs, validated judges, and tools for community-built multilingual voice-agent evaluation.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.35820 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.35820v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35820
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled $\tau$-Multilingual: Benchmarking Voice Agents Across Languages, by Soham Ray and 5 other authors
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.