Research-Oriented Human-Centric Evaluation for Foundation Models
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Research-Oriented Human-Centric Evaluation for Foundation Models
Abstract:Most current evaluations of foundation models focus on objective benchmarks, such as knowledge coverage and reasoning accuracy, often overlooking users' subjective experiences in human-AI collaboration. To address this gap, we propose a research-oriented Human-Centric Evaluation framework. It captures user perceptions across three core dimensions: problem-solving ability, information quality, and interaction experience, providing a structured, fine-grained approach to understanding how users evaluate and respond to model behavior in multi-modal research contexts. We conduct 604 human evaluation sessions across various disciplines, involving recent advanced foundation models. Through open-ended, time-limited collaborative tasks, we gather rich subjective assessments that highlight model capabilities and user preferences. Additionally, we perform an LLM-as-a-judge experiment and find that even sophisticated models struggle to accurately replicate human subjective judgment, emphasizing the irreplaceable value of first-person human assessment. Our project link is this https URL.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2506.01793 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2506.01793v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.01793
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Yijin Guo [view email][v1] Mon, 2 Jun 2025 15:33:29 UTC (3,532 KB)
[v2] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:14:01 UTC (585 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.