arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Research-Oriented Human-Centric Evaluation for Foundation Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2506.01793 (cs)
[Submitted on 2 Jun 2025 (v1), last revised 14 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Research-Oriented Human-Centric Evaluation for Foundation Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Research-Oriented Human-Centric Evaluation for Foundation Models, by Yijin Guo and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Most current evaluations of foundation models focus on objective benchmarks, such as knowledge coverage and reasoning accuracy, often overlooking users' subjective experiences in human-AI collaboration. To address this gap, we propose a research-oriented Human-Centric Evaluation framework. It captures user perceptions across three core dimensions: problem-solving ability, information quality, and interaction experience, providing a structured, fine-grained approach to understanding how users evaluate and respond to model behavior in multi-modal research contexts. We conduct 604 human evaluation sessions across various disciplines, involving recent advanced foundation models. Through open-ended, time-limited collaborative tasks, we gather rich subjective assessments that highlight model capabilities and user preferences. Additionally, we perform an LLM-as-a-judge experiment and find that even sophisticated models struggle to accurately replicate human subjective judgment, emphasizing the irreplaceable value of first-person human assessment. Our project link is this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2506.01793 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2506.01793v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.01793
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yijin Guo [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 Jun 2025 15:33:29 UTC (3,532 KB)
[v2] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 04:14:01 UTC (585 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language