PragMatch: Separating Pragmatic Incongruity from Cross-Modal Mismatch in Large Vision-Language Models
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:PragMatch: Separating Pragmatic Incongruity from Cross-Modal Mismatch in Large Vision-Language Models
Abstract:Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they genuinely reason about relationships between images and text or rely on superficial correlations, known as shortcut learning. This question is particularly important for multimodal sarcasm detection, where successful prediction depends on recognizing pragmatic incongruity rather than treating sarcasm as simple image-text mismatch. We introduce PragMatch, a controlled benchmark of 3,000 image-text pairs derived from MMSD2.0, including original sarcastic examples and constructed literal and hard-negative pairs. We identify influential shortcut cues through systematic masking and evaluate their impact through targeted injection experiments. Our results show that LVLM predictions are sensitive to lexical, OCR-derived and stylistic cues, with injected surface signals causing substantial changes in model predictions despite unchanged underlying image-text relationships. Our findings reveal limitations in current LVLMs while PragMatch provides a systematic testbed for evaluating multimodal pragmatic reasoning beyond surface-level image-text alignment.
| Comments: | Under Review |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.09772 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.09772v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.09772
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Zhanna Mukhametsharip [view email][v1] Mon, 10 Aug 2026 16:00:04 UTC (2,739 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.