arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Harmful SFT Leaves a Continuous Trace in LLM Checkpoint Updates

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2610.07518 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Oct 2026]

Title:Harmful SFT Leaves a Continuous Trace in LLM Checkpoint Updates

View a PDF of the paper titled Harmful SFT Leaves a Continuous Trace in LLM Checkpoint Updates, by Ziqun Bao and Xinyu Zhang and Yuchen Shao and Chengcheng Wan
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Safety auditing of post-trained large language models typically relies on model behavior, requiring model execution and depending on the coverage of available evaluations. This work asks a different question: Do the target behaviors optimized during supervised fine-tuning (SFT) leave readable evidence directly in checkpoint updates? We find that harmful-compliance SFT induces a continuous, objective-dependent ordering in checkpoint-update space. Using a reference geometry defined by pure harmful-compliance, safety-targeted, and benign-utility SFT, we find that a checkpoint-level coordinate s_H tracks controlled harmful-objective composition with Spearman correlations of 0.986-0.992 across four 7-8B backbones, with the same ordering persisting at larger model scales. Matched compliance-versus-refusal controls show that this checkpoint trace reflects the SFT objective rather than harmful-input exposure, while additional controls rule out simple explanations based on harmful-example count or generic training intensity. Building on this structure, we introduce TRACE, a weights-only auditing method that localizes an unknown checkpoint update relative to frozen harmful and non-harmful reference prototypes and converts this geometry into a continuous harmful-objective score. TRACE requires neither model queries nor access to the unknown SFT data, and can be evaluated directly from checkpoint updates. Across distribution shifts, unseen data, different SFT configurations, partial checkpoint access, and LoRA/full-parameter fine-tuning, the trace remains stable and is positively associated with independently measured attack success rates. TRACE remains informative even at low harmful-objective proportions, providing a complementary auditing signal when behavioral evaluation is unavailable or incomplete. Code is available at this https URL.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.07518 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.07518v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07518
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ziqun Bao [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Oct 2026 23:28:45 UTC (936 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Harmful SFT Leaves a Continuous Trace in LLM Checkpoint Updates, by Ziqun Bao and Xinyu Zhang and Yuchen Shao and Chengcheng Wan
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning