arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.00862 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]

Title:CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models

View a PDF of the paper titled CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models, by Qizhi Jiang and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks by leveraging long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories, yet they frequently exhibit overthinking on simple queries, resulting in significant token overhead and reduced inference efficiency. However, existing compression methods predominantly apply uniform length reduction or rely on coarse-grained difficulty estimation, often leading to performance degradation on difficult problems. To address this limitation, we propose Confidence-Adaptive Thinking (CAT), a framework that incorporates the model's intrinsic self-certainty signals as confidence into the preference optimization process, which autonomously modulates reasoning lengths based on problem difficulty. Experimental results show that CAT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on reasoning accuracy across multiple benchmarks on different base models. Our work enables LRMs to effectively compress confident responses while deliberating on uncertain ones, offering a potentially robust solution for balancing accuracy and latency in practical industrial scenarios.
Comments: Accepted at ACL 2026 Industry Track
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.00862 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.00862v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.00862
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Qizhi Jiang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:27:14 UTC (532 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language