Tone on a Budget: A Reference-Free Metric for Lexical Tone in Massively Multilingual Text-to-Speech
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.14817 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026]
Title:Tone on a Budget: A Reference-Free Metric for Lexical Tone in Massively Multilingual Text-to-Speech
View a PDF of the paper titled Tone on a Budget: A Reference-Free Metric for Lexical Tone in Massively Multilingual Text-to-Speech, by Moses Daudu and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In Yorùbá, pitch alone separates \d{o}k\d{o} (husband, Mid), \d{o}k\d{ò} (vehicle, Low), and \d{o}k\d{ó} (hoe, High) -- the diacritics ARE the tone marks. Yet character error rate (CER), the standard automated metric for text-to-speech (TTS), is in practice computed from ASR output that drops those marks: a synthesizer can ace CER and still say vehicle for husband. We introduce DunDun -- named for the dùndún, the Yorùbá talking drum that speaks through pitch alone -- an automated, reference-free lexical-tone metric that needs no tone-labelled corpus. The gold High/Mid/Low sequence is read from the input text's diacritics (in TTS that text exists by construction, so no reference recording is needed); the prediction comes from the audio's pitch track. We validate three ways. Flattening pitch with PSOLA resynthesis collapses DunDun while CER does not move. Inverting High and Low in the answer key of 300 native recordings drives the two-class readout to 0.14, symmetrically below its 0.35 chance level -- a consistency check on the scoring path, not independent evidence. And three native listeners, over 67 blind A/B trials, pick the tone-correct clip 89.6% of the time (95% CI 80.0-94.8; p < 1e-4); whether DunDun tracks those judgements trial by trial is not resolved at this sample size. Applied to a massively multilingual zero-shot TTS model, DunDun shows what CER cannot: Yorùbá tone sits near the native anchor before any Yorùbá fine-tuning (0.567 +/- 0.02 over five decode seeds vs. 0.596; chance 0.33), despite the 21.4% CER the model's own paper reports; and a few hours of clean audio halve CER (5.6% to 2.7% by 5h, 1.7% by 15h) while tone saturates within the hour. On non-tonal Swahili, CER already captures the gains: the metric a language needs is language-dependent. We release the metric and the complete validation protocol.
| Comments: | 9 pages, 2 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.14817 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.14817v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14817
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Tone on a Budget: A Reference-Free Metric for Lexical Tone in Massively Multilingual Text-to-Speech, by Moses Daudu and 2 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.