Parametric Knowledge in RAG-SFT for Domain-Specific Document Generation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Parametric Knowledge in RAG-SFT for Domain-Specific Document Generation
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) fine-tuning has shown substantial improvements over vanilla RAG, yet most studies target document question answering, leaving open whether these gains transfer to specialized tasks. We study supervised RAG fine-tuning (RAG-SFT) for requirements document generation in the electronics engineering domain, adapting two 7B models under two different training data strategies. Because Rouge and BertScore poorly capture factuality on long technical text, we introduce C-FEX, a claim-based evaluation pipeline that attributes each response claim to its origin (augmented prompt or reference response), and propose Parametric Knowledge Precision (PKP), which isolates claims originating from the model's weights and measures their correctness. We show that a prior metric to assess parametric knowledge decomposes as PKP $\times$ PR, separating the rate of parametric output (PR) from its quality (PKP). Empirically, fine-tuned 7B models match or exceed a 72B baseline; standard metrics disagree with claim-based factuality and can mislead about fine-tuning gains; and, fine-tuning does not reinforce correct parametric knowledge but suppresses hallucination---models speak from their weights less often but far more reliably.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2603.23047 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2603.23047v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.23047
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Lydia Müller [view email][v1] Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:33:57 UTC (7,538 KB)
[v2] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 12:12:21 UTC (4,171 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.