A Factorial Ablation of a Speech-to-SFT Pipeline: Differential Effects on Data Quality and Downstream Transfer
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Sound
arXiv:2608.20394 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]
Title:A Factorial Ablation of a Speech-to-SFT Pipeline: Differential Effects on Data Quality and Downstream Transfer
View a PDF of the paper titled A Factorial Ablation of a Speech-to-SFT Pipeline: Differential Effects on Data Quality and Downstream Transfer, by Wonsup Shin and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Industry pipelines that turn speech into supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data via multi-stage refinement are increasingly adopted but, to our knowledge, have not been publicly ablated stage-by-stage, leaving each stage's marginal value unknown. We design a production-ready speech-to-SFT pipeline in which transcript refinement (Phase 0) and SFT data quality refinement (Phase 2) are independently toggleable, yielding a 2x2 factorial design. For each condition, we generate QA-form SFT data from Korean medical and finance conference recordings and fine-tune 9 models (5 LLM families, 2.4B-70B); we evaluate with four cross-provider LLM judges, a blind six-expert human evaluation, and 3 downstream MCQA benchmarks. Our central finding: under a fixed, standard SFT recipe, improvements in QA data quality do not transfer uniformly into downstream MCQA gains. 4-judge quality rises consistently, yet the cross-model mean MCQA gain is not significant; positive transfer concentrates on family-domain aligned pairs. This differential pattern is consistent with a format mismatch: Phase 2 shifts SFT-data composition toward explanatory items, while MCQA primarily probes factoid recall. All six human raters report higher full-pipeline quality, confirming the LLM-judge direction. An STT-engine swap to Whisper-medium confirms pipeline robustness. A non-hallucination audit shows the two frontier LLMs admit unknown on approximately 8% of QA on average; we release samples, prompts, code, and all SFT checkpoints.
| Comments: | 20 pages, 2 figures |
| Subjects: | Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.20394 [cs.SD] |
| (or arXiv:2608.20394v1 [cs.SD] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20394
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled A Factorial Ablation of a Speech-to-SFT Pipeline: Differential Effects on Data Quality and Downstream Transfer, by Wonsup Shin and 1 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.