Double Trouble: Bilingual Pretraining Leaves Language-Conditioned Effects in Shared-Language Representations
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Double Trouble: Bilingual Pretraining Leaves Language-Conditioned Effects in Shared-Language Representations
Abstract:When researchers compare multilingual models for probing, interpretability, or cross-lingual transfer, they often align embedding spaces and assume that shared-language representations are comparable. We show that this assumption can be premature for decoder-only models. We pretrain paired 310M-parameter models (one English-only, one bilingual) across eight typologically diverse languages, separately controlling for English exposure, total compute, and document overlap. After aligning on shared English vocabulary, we test held-out words and find that token embeddings look similar after alignment, but the deeper hidden states that the model uses for prediction do not. This gap holds for all eight languages and survives controls for document overlap and alternative alignment methods. This hidden-state mismatch grows through middle transformer layers, suggesting that it arises from contextual processing rather than the input representations where alignment is performed. Embedding alignment can mask real differences in how models internally represent a shared language, which matters for any downstream study that treats aligned models as interchangeable.
| Comments: | Published as a conference paper at EMNLP 2026 (Main) |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.26576 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.26576v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26576
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Anjishnu Mukherjee [view email][v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 03:39:24 UTC (1,709 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.