Output Dilution: Redundant but Fragile Representations in MoE Models
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Output Dilution: Redundant but Fragile Representations in MoE Models
Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models appear to encode moral content as robustly as dense models, yet prove far more fragile in their encoding. In OLMoE-1B-7B, linear probes recover moral valence from nearly every expert-layer combination, with mean peak-layer accuracy above 90%. But these representations collapse under levels of activation noise that a dense model of matched size easily tolerates, with a 4.2-fold difference in robustness.
We trace this to output dilution. Because the MoE block averages across active experts before contributing to the residual stream, the feedforward signal reaching downstream layers is nearly two orders of magnitude smaller than in a dense MLP. Moral information, our interest, survives aggregation intact but at a scale trivially overwhelmed by perturbation. Routing itself remains stable under noise while the vulnerability originates entirely in the diluted aggregate.
Checkpoint trajectories confirm this is architectural, not learned. Experts never specialize and accuracy saturates within the first few thousand steps. In sparse architectures, redundant encoding does not imply robust encoding.
| Comments: | 18 pages, 4 figures. Code and outputs at this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.6; I.2.7 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.25231 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.25231v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25231
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Orion Reblitz-Richardson [view email][v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 23:41:07 UTC (69 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.