arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Output Dilution: Redundant but Fragile Representations in MoE Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2608.25231 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Aug 2026]

Title:Output Dilution: Redundant but Fragile Representations in MoE Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Output Dilution: Redundant but Fragile Representations in MoE Models, by Orion Reblitz-Richardson
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models appear to encode moral content as robustly as dense models, yet prove far more fragile in their encoding. In OLMoE-1B-7B, linear probes recover moral valence from nearly every expert-layer combination, with mean peak-layer accuracy above 90%. But these representations collapse under levels of activation noise that a dense model of matched size easily tolerates, with a 4.2-fold difference in robustness.
We trace this to output dilution. Because the MoE block averages across active experts before contributing to the residual stream, the feedforward signal reaching downstream layers is nearly two orders of magnitude smaller than in a dense MLP. Moral information, our interest, survives aggregation intact but at a scale trivially overwhelmed by perturbation. Routing itself remains stable under noise while the vulnerability originates entirely in the diluted aggregate.
Checkpoint trajectories confirm this is architectural, not learned. Experts never specialize and accuracy saturates within the first few thousand steps. In sparse architectures, redundant encoding does not imply robust encoding.
Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures. Code and outputs at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2608.25231 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2608.25231v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25231
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Orion Reblitz-Richardson [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 23:41:07 UTC (69 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language