SimulRAG: Simulator-based RAG for Grounding LLMs in Long-form Scientific QA
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:SimulRAG: Simulator-based RAG for Grounding LLMs in Long-form Scientific QA
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in generating long-form scientific explanations that synthesize evidence and connect multiple factors. However, in long-form scientific question answering, LLMs often hallucinate, producing unsupported or inconsistent claims. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves trustworthiness by grounding generation in external sources; scientific simulators are valuable because they can validate quantitative hypotheses and capture evolving dynamics. Yet simulation-based RAG is non-trivial due to two challenges: how to retrieve from scientific simulators, and how to efficiently verify and update long-form answers. To overcome these challenges, we propose SimulRAG, a simulator-based RAG framework with a generalized retrieval interface that translates between text and simulator parameters/outputs. SimulRAG further introduces claim-level generation with uncertainty estimation and simulator boundary assessment (UE+SBA) to selectively verify and update claims. Unlike tool-first or holistic answer revision, it first elicits diverse answers without retrieval and then grounds uncertain, simulator-verifiable atomic claims with simulator evidence. We also release a long-form scientific QA benchmark spanning climate science, epidemiology, and urban planning, with ground truth verified by simulations and human annotators. Experiments show SimulRAG improves informativeness by 30.4% and factuality by 16.3% over the strongest adapted RAG baselines, while UE+SBA enhances claim-level efficiency and quality.
| Comments: | Haozhou Xu and Dongxia Wu are co-first authors |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2509.25459 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2509.25459v4 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.25459
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Haozhou Xu [view email][v1] Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:07:00 UTC (7,067 KB)
[v2] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 08:59:50 UTC (9,372 KB)
[v3] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:55:50 UTC (9,372 KB)
[v4] Tue, 18 Aug 2026 04:54:48 UTC (9,372 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Recipes for Steering and Scaling LLMs via Sampling
Aug 28
-
Can a Model Catch Its Own Hallucinations for Free?: Label-Free Doubt Signals Hold Their Own Against a Labelled Dataset for Abstention
Aug 28
-
FIRSTPASS: A Multi-Domain, Multi-Round Peer Review Dataset Grounded in Real Editorial Outcomes
Aug 28
-
Interpretable, Fairly Evaluated Automated L2 Speaking Assessment that Beats the Single-Human Ceiling and Why Pause Encoding Does Not Change LLM Fluency Scores
Aug 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.