arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Better Retrieval, Worse Robustness:How Multi-hop RAG Amplifies Upstream ASR Errors

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.22872 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Aug 2026]

Title:Better Retrieval, Worse Robustness:How Multi-hop RAG Amplifies Upstream ASR Errors

Authors:Zhenghua Bao
View a PDF of the paper titled Better Retrieval, Worse Robustness:How Multi-hop RAG Amplifies Upstream ASR Errors, by Zhenghua Bao
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Speech-based applications pass spoken queries through automatic speech recognition (ASR) before any retrieval module, so ASR errors enter the pipeline as a fixed upstream constraint. We empirically test whether two extensions to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), entity-graph linking and iterative reformulation, absorb or amplify these errors. Using four English accents synthesized through neural TTS, we evaluate four RAG configurations on three multi-hop QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA and MuSiQue) against a clean-text oracle. Although the structurally richer configurations generally retain higher absolute F1 under ASR input, both extensions amplify the error: the F1 gap from clean text to the highest-WER accent is 36-67% larger under their combination than under naive dense retrieval, on all three benchmarks. The dominant failure mode is corruption of one or more query entities, accounting for 87-96% of degradation cases on 2WikiMultiHopQA across all four methods. Two lightweight surface-form mitigations leave most of the gap intact, indicating that downstream retrieval structure amplifies remaining entity errors. We release code and data at this https URL .
Comments: Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.22872 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.22872v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22872
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhenghua Bao [view email]
[v1] Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:59:34 UTC (78 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language